LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER

The consequences of global warming have led to various questions about the effectiveness of climate governance architectures. In some respects, the issue is a transnational public problem, since it is treated as concerning to the global society, giving rise to numerous controversies regarding its ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Piccinin, Grasieli, Pereira, Reginaldo, Winckler, Silvana
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2024
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)
Repository:Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online)
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.ucsnew.ojsbrasil.com.br:article/11732
Online Access:https://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/11732
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Justiça anormal
Justiça climática
Mudanças climáticas
Problemas públicos
Stakeholders
Litigância Climática
Governança Climática
Legitimação
Justiça Climática
Abnormal justice
Climate justice
Climate changes
Public problems
Climate Litigation
climate governance
Legitimation
id BR_b159d33fa63cabccbeea3dc1ce0f980e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ucsnew.ojsbrasil.com.br:article/11732
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
A legitimação para a Governança e Litigância Climáticas a partir da ampliação conceitual da Justiça: : Aproximações entre as narrativas de Mary Robinson e as perspectivas teóricas de Nancy Fraser
APROXIMAÇÕES ENTRE AS NARRATIVAS DE MARY ROBINSON E AS PERSPECTIVAS TEÓRICAS DE NANCY FRASER: Aproximações entre as narrativas de Mary Robinson e as perspectivas teóricas de Nancy Fraser
title LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
spellingShingle LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
Piccinin, Grasieli
Justiça anormal
Justiça climática
Mudanças climáticas
Problemas públicos
Stakeholders
Litigância Climática
Governança Climática
Legitimação
Stakeholders
Justiça Climática
Abnormal justice
Climate justice
Climate changes
Public problems
Stakeholders
Climate Litigation
climate governance
Legitimation
Stakeholders
Climate justice
title_short LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
title_full LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
title_fullStr LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
title_full_unstemmed LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
title_sort LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASER
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Piccinin, Grasieli
Pereira, Reginaldo
Winckler, Silvana
author Piccinin, Grasieli
author_facet Piccinin, Grasieli
Pereira, Reginaldo
Winckler, Silvana
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Reginaldo
Winckler, Silvana
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Justiça anormal
Justiça climática
Mudanças climáticas
Problemas públicos
Stakeholders
Litigância Climática
Governança Climática
Legitimação
Stakeholders
Justiça Climática
Abnormal justice
Climate justice
Climate changes
Public problems
Stakeholders
Climate Litigation
climate governance
Legitimation
Stakeholders
Climate justice
topic Justiça anormal
Justiça climática
Mudanças climáticas
Problemas públicos
Stakeholders
Litigância Climática
Governança Climática
Legitimação
Stakeholders
Justiça Climática
Abnormal justice
Climate justice
Climate changes
Public problems
Stakeholders
Climate Litigation
climate governance
Legitimation
Stakeholders
Climate justice
description The consequences of global warming have led to various questions about the effectiveness of climate governance architectures. In some respects, the issue is a transnational public problem, since it is treated as concerning to the global society, giving rise to numerous controversies regarding its causes and consequences and generating expectations regarding its solution. This article deals with an area that is generally treated as peripheral to the debate, related to the inequitable distribution of the consequences of climate change. Its aim is to analyze the potential of action of communities most vulnerable to climate imbalance to drive redefinitions regarding who has the legitimacy and ownership to define and solve the problem. As a methodological strategy, the text approaches Mary Robinson's accounts of the ability of populations exposed to human rights violations related to climate change to give visibility to the problem and, based on Nancy Fraser's three-dimensional theory of justice, verifies possibilities for the adoption of governance structures based on the recognition of climate injustices and the participation of those who convey them as inconvenient truths. The work is based on the deductive method and uses literature review as a research technique. It can be concluded that climate injustice, broadened conceptually, is capable of structuring more resilient governance models based on the inclusion and consultation of a more significant and plural number of stakeholders.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Double blind peer review
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/11732
10.18226/22370021.v13.n3.12
url https://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/11732
identifier_str_mv 10.18226/22370021.v13.n3.12
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/11732/5905
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade de Caxias do Sul - EDUCS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade de Caxias do Sul - EDUCS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Law and Society; Vol. 13 No. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 2023
Revista Derecho Ambiental & Sociedad; Vol. 13 Núm. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 2023
Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade; v. 13 n. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 2023
2237-0021
2316-8218
reponame:Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)
instacron:UCS
instname_str Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)
instacron_str UCS
institution UCS
reponame_str Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online)
collection Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rdas@ucs.br || rdasucs@gmail.com
_version_ 1853666065204117504
spelling LEGITIMIZATION FOR CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND LITIGATION FROM THE CONCEPTUAL EXPANSION OF JUSTICE : APPROXIMATIONS BETWEEN THE NARRATIVES OF MARY ROBINSON AND THE THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES OF NANCY FRASERA legitimação para a Governança e Litigância Climáticas a partir da ampliação conceitual da Justiça: : Aproximações entre as narrativas de Mary Robinson e as perspectivas teóricas de Nancy FraserAPROXIMAÇÕES ENTRE AS NARRATIVAS DE MARY ROBINSON E AS PERSPECTIVAS TEÓRICAS DE NANCY FRASER: Aproximações entre as narrativas de Mary Robinson e as perspectivas teóricas de Nancy FraserJustiça anormalJustiça climáticaMudanças climáticasProblemas públicosStakeholdersLitigância ClimáticaGovernança ClimáticaLegitimaçãoStakeholdersJustiça ClimáticaAbnormal justiceClimate justiceClimate changesPublic problemsStakeholdersClimate Litigationclimate governanceLegitimationStakeholdersClimate justiceThe consequences of global warming have led to various questions about the effectiveness of climate governance architectures. In some respects, the issue is a transnational public problem, since it is treated as concerning to the global society, giving rise to numerous controversies regarding its causes and consequences and generating expectations regarding its solution. This article deals with an area that is generally treated as peripheral to the debate, related to the inequitable distribution of the consequences of climate change. Its aim is to analyze the potential of action of communities most vulnerable to climate imbalance to drive redefinitions regarding who has the legitimacy and ownership to define and solve the problem. As a methodological strategy, the text approaches Mary Robinson's accounts of the ability of populations exposed to human rights violations related to climate change to give visibility to the problem and, based on Nancy Fraser's three-dimensional theory of justice, verifies possibilities for the adoption of governance structures based on the recognition of climate injustices and the participation of those who convey them as inconvenient truths. The work is based on the deductive method and uses literature review as a research technique. It can be concluded that climate injustice, broadened conceptually, is capable of structuring more resilient governance models based on the inclusion and consultation of a more significant and plural number of stakeholders.As consequências decorrentes do aquecimento global têm levado a questionamentos de diversas ordens acerca da eficácia das arquiteturas de governança climática. Em alguns aspectos o tema afirma-se como um problema público transnacional, já que é tratado como respeitante à sociedade global, a ensejar numerosas controvérsias relativas às suas causas e consequências e que geram expectativas relacionadas à sua solução. O presente artigo aborda um recorte tratado, geralmente, como periférico ao debate, relacionado à distribuição não equânime das consequências das mudanças climáticas. Seu objetivo é analisar o potencial da atuação de comunidades mais vulneráveis ao desequilíbrio climático de impulsionar redefinições relativas a quem detém legitimidade e propriedade (ownership) para definir e resolver o problema. Como estratégia metodológica, o texto aproxima os relatos de Mary Robinson sobre a capacidade de populações expostas a violações a direitos humanos, relacionadas a alterações climáticas, a dar visibilidade ao problema e, a partir da teoria tridimensional de justiça de Nancy Fraser, verifica possibilidades para a adoção de estruturas de governança pautadas no reconhecimento das injustiças climáticas e na participação daqueles que as veiculam como verdades inconvenientes. O trabalho é pautado pelo método dedutivo e utiliza a revisão bibliográfica como técnica de pesquisa. Conclui-se que a injustiça climática, alargada conceitualmente, é capaz de estruturar modelos de governança mais resilientes e pautados na inclusão e oitiva de um número mais significativo e plural de stakeholders.Editora da Universidade de Caxias do Sul - EDUCS2024-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDouble blind peer reviewArtigo avaliado pelos paresTextoapplication/pdfhttps://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/1173210.18226/22370021.v13.n3.12Journal of Environmental Law and Society; Vol. 13 No. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 2023Revista Derecho Ambiental & Sociedad; Vol. 13 Núm. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 2023Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade; v. 13 n. 03 (2023): Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade | v. 13, n. 3 | set./dez. 20232237-00212316-8218reponame:Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)instacron:UCSporhttps://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/article/view/11732/5905Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPiccinin, GrasieliPereira, ReginaldoWinckler, Silvana2024-12-11T18:15:20Zoai:ojs2.ucsnew.ojsbrasil.com.br:article/11732Revistahttps://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/PUBhttps://sou.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/direitoambiental/oairdas@ucs.br || rdasucs@gmail.com2237-00212316-8218opendoar:2024-12-11T18:15:20Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS)false
score 15.300724