Karl Marx entre a crítica da religião e do colonialismo: dialética e fetichismo no livro I de O Capital

What method did Karl Marx mobilize in his critique of political economy? Considering Marx's own notes, this method would appear, above all, after 1857. In this sense, this work sought to understand the dialectical method as a critical exposition of the system of bourgeois economy. Understanding...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Andrade, Douglas Sobrinho de
Formato: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/16661
Acesso em linha:http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/16661
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Marx
Dialética materialista
Teoria do fetichismo
Crítica à religião
Crítica ao colonialismo
subject.br-rjbn
Filosofia
Descrição
Resumo:What method did Karl Marx mobilize in his critique of political economy? Considering Marx's own notes, this method would appear, above all, after 1857. In this sense, this work sought to understand the dialectical method as a critical exposition of the system of bourgeois economy. Understanding the limits of dialectics as a critical exposition, we advanced on the relationship of materialist dialectics with the Marxian theory of fetishism. Consequently, we understand the theory of fetishism as the methodological tool that points out, within the architectural structure of the first book of Capital, the necessary historical presupposition of critical exposition. With this scope, our work analyzed the preparatory texts of Capital I and its first chapter. Thus, we realized that the simple circulation, that is, the first chapters of Capital I, presupposes the original accumulation that only appears in the last act of this exposition. As an unfolding of the relationship between dialectics and fetishism, we also investigate the Marxian critique of religion and critique of colonialism. Just as Marx was interpellated by the political struggles of his time, we attempt to interpellate the Marxian text on the ambiguous role of religion as expression and protest, based on the struggles of liberation Christianity in Latin America. Furthermore, we investigate Marx's evolution in the evaluation of colonialism, perceiving the colonial system precisely as the historical presupposition of capitalism.