Would the Husserl’s phenomenological reduction be so radical?
Phenomenology, as we all know, was one the most central philosophical movements along 20th century, having as cornerstone a method of suspension of any and all belief about world existence, a kind of phenomenological reduction as termed Husserl. The text first movement brings up what Husserl elabora...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12496 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/12496 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fenomenologia Redução fenomenológica Linguagem Filosofia transcendental Intencionalidade Phenomenology Phenomenological reduction Language Transcendental philosophy Intentionality |
| Sumario: | Phenomenology, as we all know, was one the most central philosophical movements along 20th century, having as cornerstone a method of suspension of any and all belief about world existence, a kind of phenomenological reduction as termed Husserl. The text first movement brings up what Husserl elaborates upon that reduction guided by one of his fundamental books: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. The other text movement raise questions over his method as well its effective application: Would Husserl had been effectively as radical as his own method demands? Language should not be included in that radicality demanded? |
|---|