The enunciative arguments
It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| Repositorio: | letrônica |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30470 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/letronica/article/view/30470 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Argumentation Enunciation Tone Attribution. Argumentação Enunciação Tom Atribuição. |
| Resumo: | It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desirable, threatening (Bally), making use of it to demand, promise, presuppose (Austin) or even conceive it as the thought of other than you (Bally). Ducrot’s theory, as it is known, has opposed to this division and specifically to the hypothesis that it would be possible to isolate, within the meaning of an utterance, a representation of the world totally apart from the speaker's intuitions (Ducrot, 1993). The Theory of Argumentation within Language, followed by the Theory of Semantic Blocks (TSB) came up in order to appraise a positive meaning to Ducrot's refusal. Thus, as it is said by TSB, the contents of our utterances might be intertwines as argumentative threads. |
|---|