Da (des)necessária distinção entre complemento nominal e adjunto adnominal: uma análise histórico-bibliográfica
The research proposed in this article results from an analysis of Latin and Portuguese grammars and so from modern normative grammars about the treatment that these works have given to nominal complements and adnominal adjuncts linked to nouns that indicate action or quality by the preposition of. T...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositório: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/59218 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.18364/rc.v2i53.217 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59218 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Diacronia Complemento terminativo Complemento restritivo Complemento nominal Adjunto Adnominal Gramatica |
| Resumo: | The research proposed in this article results from an analysis of Latin and Portuguese grammars and so from modern normative grammars about the treatment that these works have given to nominal complements and adnominal adjuncts linked to nouns that indicate action or quality by the preposition of. The generalizations we have reached suggest that historically both terms have the same syntactic status and that their distinction into two distinct categories, which is based on semantic criteria, results from a dichotomous analogy between the notions of relative / abstract / terminative and absolute / concrete / restrictive. |
|---|