Discourse analysis and deaf literature: understandings about deaf literary production
The study of literary discourse is justified by the need and importance of understanding the texts of deaf literature, which have been increasingly circulating socially in the academic space. In order to think about the relations proper to the approach of texts in this sphere, we proceeded to a theo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN) |
| Repositorio: | Cadernos de Linguística |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs3.cadernos.abralin.org:article/115 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/115 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Análise de Discurso Emmanuelle Laborit Literatura Surda Sujeito Surdo Discourse Analysis Deaf Literature Deaf Subject |
| Sumario: | The study of literary discourse is justified by the need and importance of understanding the texts of deaf literature, which have been increasingly circulating socially in the academic space. In order to think about the relations proper to the approach of texts in this sphere, we proceeded to a theoretical research on Discourse Analysis of French line, initiated by Michel Pêcheux and expanded by Eni Orlandi, in Brazil, and, we selected as clippings from the autobiographical book O Voo / Grito da Gaivota, by Emmanuelle Laborit, deaf. Reading a literature text is to dive into a different and intriguing world, when we refer more precisely to Deaf Literature, we return, in our social imaginary, to the deaf subject position, a historically denied position, but the position of writer and producer of his own literature. Reading the material allowed us to understand how the deaf subject's subjectivation process takes place in the midst of an ombudsman society, in which the normalization discourse imposes its constitution. This process is strengthened by the recognition of Emmanuelle in the position of diversity, while deaf, in / through sign language, his possibility of being a subject is built from his own language. |
|---|