Corpus-based study on the use of cohesive devices in the lesson plans of pre-service teachers
This study explores the use of cohesive devices in lesson plans (LPs) prepared by pre-service teachers across various subjects, specifically focusing on English, Math, and Biology majorships in a state university in the Philippines. The research highlights the prevalent use of personal references am...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Alagoas (UNEAL) |
| Repositorio: | Diversitas Journal |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.diversitasjournal.com.br:article/3099 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://diversitasjournal.com.br/diversitas_journal/article/view/3099 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | cohesive devices cohesion lesson plan pre-service teachers corpus-based study lesson plans, educational linguistics |
| Sumario: | This study explores the use of cohesive devices in lesson plans (LPs) prepared by pre-service teachers across various subjects, specifically focusing on English, Math, and Biology majorships in a state university in the Philippines. The research highlights the prevalent use of personal references among English pre-service teachers, who favor the word "you" for its role in maintaining a second- and third-person perspective. In contrast, Math and Biology pre-service teachers predominantly employ nominal substitutions and conjunctions to enhance coherence in their LPs. The study also notes the absence of ellipsis in the analyzed LPs and identifies the predominant use of nominal substitution and extension conjunctions across subjects. By comparing the frequency and types of cohesive devices used, the research underscores the variations in linguistic strategies employed by pre-service teachers of different disciplines. The findings suggest a need for greater awareness and training on the effective use of cohesive devices to improve lesson planning and instructional clarity. |
|---|