A comparative analysis of two of Nietzsche’s perspectives about the socratic-platonic concept of good
This essay compares mainly two texts of Nietzsche’s which bare apparently contradictory views about the socratic-platonic concept of Good, namely the posthumous note of NF 1888 14 [146], and the aphorism found in Human, All Too Human, 102. We investigate why Nietzsche makes two such apparently disco...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| Repositorio: | Veritas (Porto Alegre. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42672 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/veritas/article/view/42672 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | good Nietzsche perspectivism Plato Socrates bien perspectivismo Platón Sócrates bem Platão |
| Sumario: | This essay compares mainly two texts of Nietzsche’s which bare apparently contradictory views about the socratic-platonic concept of Good, namely the posthumous note of NF 1888 14 [146], and the aphorism found in Human, All Too Human, 102. We investigate why Nietzsche makes two such apparently disconnected statements and what it signals about his way of thinking and the concept of perspectivism. |
|---|