TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE
In Brazilian jurisprudence, Post-Positivism (or Neoconstitutionalism) is a kind of unique discourse. Built on a caricature of its predecessor, Post-Positivism does not offer consistent solutions to the problems of Legal Positivism. In fact, it ends up being a great retrocession to Natural Law, prese...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
| Repositorio: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/24 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | problemas do pós-positivismo positivismo jurídico prática jurídica problems of post-positivism legal positivism legal practice |
| Resumo: | In Brazilian jurisprudence, Post-Positivism (or Neoconstitutionalism) is a kind of unique discourse. Built on a caricature of its predecessor, Post-Positivism does not offer consistent solutions to the problems of Legal Positivism. In fact, it ends up being a great retrocession to Natural Law, presenting exactly the same problems that Legal Positivism, more than a century ago, struggled to correct. A democratic legal practice does not presuppose “leaving aside” Legal Positivism. It can only be made “from” it. |
|---|