A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods

The objective of this study was to assess welfare of cattle during bleeding after slaughter with or without stunning. A total of 434 bulls were distributed across three slaughter treatments: penetrating captive bolt stunning followed by chest sticking (PCB, N = 279), non-penetrating captive bolt stu...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Neves, J. E.G., Paranhos da Costa, M. J.R. [UNESP], Roça, R. O. [UNESP], Faucitano, L., Gregory, N. G.
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172614
Acesso em linha:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172614
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Cranial nerve reflexes
Non-penetrating captive bolt
Pain responses
Penetrating captive bolt
Shechita
id BR_9dc463b3ec6ff985ac2cd90d287ff4bc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172614
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
spelling A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methodsCranial nerve reflexesNon-penetrating captive boltPain responsesPenetrating captive boltShechitaThe objective of this study was to assess welfare of cattle during bleeding after slaughter with or without stunning. A total of 434 bulls were distributed across three slaughter treatments: penetrating captive bolt stunning followed by chest sticking (PCB, N = 279), non-penetrating captive bolt stunning followed by halal slaughter (NPCB, N = 67) and shechita without previous stunning (SHE, N = 88). Four measures of possible consciousness and return to sensibility were recorded 20 and 60 s after bleeding as welfare indicators. They were the frequencies of responses to nostril stimulation and tongue pinch, spontaneous eye blinking, and rhythmic breathing. All responses were absent in stunned cattle at both 20 and 60 s, and in SHE cattle 7, 4, 10, and 100% of the animals presented these responses, respectively. Repeat shots were required for 46% NPCB and 2% PCB (P < 0.05). The application of religious slaughter without previous stunning may result in greater risk of cattle suffering, pain and distress at slaughter.Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Brasília - IFB, Campus PlanaltinaGrupo ETCO Departamento de Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESPDepartamento de Economia Sociologia e Tecnologia Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu UNESPAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2000 College StreetRoyal Veterinary College University of LondonGrupo ETCO Departamento de Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESPDepartamento de Economia Sociologia e Tecnologia Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu UNESPCiência e Tecnologia de Brasília - IFBUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of London2018-12-11T17:01:27Z2018-12-11T17:01:27Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article41-43application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033Meat Science, v. 117, p. 41-43.0309-1740http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17261410.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.0332-s2.0-849594315532-s2.0-84959431553.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMeat Science1,643info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, J. E.G.Paranhos da Costa, M. J.R. [UNESP]Roça, R. O. [UNESP]Faucitano, L.Gregory, N. G.2024-06-07T18:39:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172614Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-06-07T18:39Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
title A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
spellingShingle A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
Neves, J. E.G.
Cranial nerve reflexes
Non-penetrating captive bolt
Pain responses
Penetrating captive bolt
Shechita
title_short A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
title_full A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
title_fullStr A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
title_full_unstemmed A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
title_sort A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Neves, J. E.G.
Paranhos da Costa, M. J.R. [UNESP]
Roça, R. O. [UNESP]
Faucitano, L.
Gregory, N. G.
author Neves, J. E.G.
author_facet Neves, J. E.G.
Paranhos da Costa, M. J.R. [UNESP]
Roça, R. O. [UNESP]
Faucitano, L.
Gregory, N. G.
author_role author
author2 Paranhos da Costa, M. J.R. [UNESP]
Roça, R. O. [UNESP]
Faucitano, L.
Gregory, N. G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Tecnologia de Brasília - IFB
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
University of London
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cranial nerve reflexes
Non-penetrating captive bolt
Pain responses
Penetrating captive bolt
Shechita
topic Cranial nerve reflexes
Non-penetrating captive bolt
Pain responses
Penetrating captive bolt
Shechita
description The objective of this study was to assess welfare of cattle during bleeding after slaughter with or without stunning. A total of 434 bulls were distributed across three slaughter treatments: penetrating captive bolt stunning followed by chest sticking (PCB, N = 279), non-penetrating captive bolt stunning followed by halal slaughter (NPCB, N = 67) and shechita without previous stunning (SHE, N = 88). Four measures of possible consciousness and return to sensibility were recorded 20 and 60 s after bleeding as welfare indicators. They were the frequencies of responses to nostril stimulation and tongue pinch, spontaneous eye blinking, and rhythmic breathing. All responses were absent in stunned cattle at both 20 and 60 s, and in SHE cattle 7, 4, 10, and 100% of the animals presented these responses, respectively. Repeat shots were required for 46% NPCB and 2% PCB (P < 0.05). The application of religious slaughter without previous stunning may result in greater risk of cattle suffering, pain and distress at slaughter.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
2018-12-11T17:01:27Z
2018-12-11T17:01:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033
Meat Science, v. 117, p. 41-43.
0309-1740
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172614
10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033
2-s2.0-84959431553
2-s2.0-84959431553.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172614
identifier_str_mv Meat Science, v. 117, p. 41-43.
0309-1740
10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033
2-s2.0-84959431553
2-s2.0-84959431553.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Meat Science
1,643
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 41-43
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1853671420079374336
score 15,300719