A critique of punishment I
THIS IS THE FIRST PART OF A WORK ABOUT THE THEORIES USED TO JUSTIFY PUNISHMENT IN CRIMINAL LAW. THIS ARTICLE ASSUMES THERE IS A GROWING DEMAND FOR MORE FREQUENT AND HARDER PUNISHMENT IN WESTERN SOCIETIES NOWADAYS AND THEN PRESENTS AND CRITICIZES THE MAIN TRADICIONAL THEORIES USED TO JUSTIFY PUNISHME...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2006 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Direito GV |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/35149 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35149 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | PUNISHMENT THEORIES ABOUT PUNISHMENT RETRIBUTION PREVENTION PENA TEORIAS DA PENA RETRIBUIÇÃO PREVENÇÃO |
| Resumo: | THIS IS THE FIRST PART OF A WORK ABOUT THE THEORIES USED TO JUSTIFY PUNISHMENT IN CRIMINAL LAW. THIS ARTICLE ASSUMES THERE IS A GROWING DEMAND FOR MORE FREQUENT AND HARDER PUNISHMENT IN WESTERN SOCIETIES NOWADAYS AND THEN PRESENTS AND CRITICIZES THE MAIN TRADICIONAL THEORIES USED TO JUSTIFY PUNISHMENT. ACCORDING TO THE AUTHOR, NONE OF THESE THEORIES RESISTS RATIONAL CRITIQUE. |
|---|