O que é um humano?: anotações sobre duas controvérsias
This work is a study on two controversies, which are: the Valladolid debate,which opposed Bartolomé de Las Casas and Juan Ginés Sepúlveda around the question to know if the american indians were humans; the controversy that took place in Brazilian Supreme Court between 2005 and 2008, about the use o...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/VCSA-8CYFQE |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/VCSA-8CYFQE |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Bartolomé de Las Casas Embrião extracorpora Controvérsia de Valladolid Células-tronco embrionárias Juan Ginés Sepúlveda Sociologia Indios Trato Células tronco embrionárias Escravidão Casas, Bartolome de Las, 1474-1566 Sepulveda, Juan Gines de, 1490-1573 |
| Sumario: | This work is a study on two controversies, which are: the Valladolid debate,which opposed Bartolomé de Las Casas and Juan Ginés Sepúlveda around the question to know if the american indians were humans; the controversy that took place in Brazilian Supreme Court between 2005 and 2008, about the use of criopreserved embryos in the stem cell research. From the study of these debates, it is intended todiscuss the mechanisms operating in the definition of what counts as a human. |
|---|