Telepresential Audience and due Constitutional Process
The Covid-19 pandemic caused numerous challenges for law enforcement officials to find appropriate procedural solutions for the continuity of the procedural march. One of these solutions was provided by Ordinance No. 61 of the National Council of Justice that instituted the emergency videoconference...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
| Repositorio: | Virtuajus |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.pucminas.br:article/24455 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.pucminas.br/virtuajus/article/view/24455 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Audiência Conciliação Mediação Videoconferência Pandemia. Audience Conciliation Mediation Videoconference Pandemic |
| Sumario: | The Covid-19 pandemic caused numerous challenges for law enforcement officials to find appropriate procedural solutions for the continuity of the procedural march. One of these solutions was provided by Ordinance No. 61 of the National Council of Justice that instituted the emergency videoconference platform to hold hearings and judgment sessions in the organs of the Judiciary, in the period of social isolation, resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of this article is to analyze whether the due constitutional process is being observed in the conduct of telepresential hearings, within the scope of the common procedure of CPC / 2015, as well as within the scope of the Special Civil Courts (conciliation or mediation, sanitation and instruction). |
|---|