What is the role of ethics in the ethics of artificial intelligence?

The philosophical study of ethics concerning the interactions between human beings and technologies that deploy Artificial Intelligence has become a popular and important topic as never before. The study of problems concerning such interactions is justified because of technological transformations t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Franco, Monica
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2024
Country:Brasil
Institution:Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP)
Repository:Kínesis (Marília) - Revista de Estudos dos Pós-Graduandos em Filosofia
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/14727
Online Access:https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/kinesis/article/view/14727
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Moral Theory
Conceptual Engineering
Ética da Inteligência Artificial
Teoria Moral
Engenharia Conceitual
Description
Summary:The philosophical study of ethics concerning the interactions between human beings and technologies that deploy Artificial Intelligence has become a popular and important topic as never before. The study of problems concerning such interactions is justified because of technological transformations that human societies have gone through, and that may still lead to profound legal, political, and social changes. The main objective of this paper is to identify the role of ethics, as a philosophical discipline, concerning the recent and promising field of research of the ethics of Artificial Intelligence. After presenting the position of philosopher Peter Railton on the ethics applied to Artificial Intelligence, the paper reconstructs his explanations in normative ethics and metaethics. By illustrating the connections between the ethics applied to Artificial Intelligence and moral theory, the paper argues that the role of ethics in the ethics of Artificial Intelligence can be made explicit with the aid of conceptual engineering. This approach shows that concepts such as ‘agent’ and ‘interest,’ which are crucial for ethics, as seen in Railton’s explanations, should not be thought of exclusively by ethics, or even only by philosophy, but need to be informed by natural and human sciences. The paper emphasizes the need to accomplish the philosophical task of thinking ethics beyond ethics in an interdisciplinary context capable of dealing with complex practical problems that impact human societies.