Related urban processes: peripheralization and social housing production in the core of the metropolitan region of Curitiba through the minha casa minha vida program
AbstractThe article discusses the implementation of social housing by the “Minha Casa, Minha vida” (MCMV) - My House, My Life - program regarding the concept of housing and sustainability principles related to the peripheralization process. The text aims to identify urban and socio-environmental cha...
| Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
| Repository: | Revista de Direito da Cidade |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/64648 |
| Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rdc/article/view/64648 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Urban sprawl. Social housing. Sustainability. My House My Life Program. Nucleus of the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba – NUC-RMC. |
| Summary: | AbstractThe article discusses the implementation of social housing by the “Minha Casa, Minha vida” (MCMV) - My House, My Life - program regarding the concept of housing and sustainability principles related to the peripheralization process. The text aims to identify urban and socio-environmental characteristics of existing cases in the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba, to understand possibilities of future advances in the socio-environmental quality in these public policies. The methodological procedures included a quantitative and qualitative approach; use of the QGIS geoprocessing software. The analysis strategy applied Blue House Seal methodology, considered the most suitable system for assessing social housing in Brazil evaluating 53 sub-items: urban quality, design and comfort, energy efficiency, conservation of material resources, management water and social practices. The results showed that the MCMV does not apply the full concept of housing; assumes the financing of the enterprise, however, not its sustainability; passes on to other actors (city halls, businessmen, users) items such as the development of social action programs and projects; solution of eventual architectural and urban problems. This process amplifies the social periphery, a citizen due to the difficulties in accessing the residents to opportunities for educational, professional and individual fulfillment, relegating, finally, to the users, the sustainability of the buildings. |
|---|