From Where Do We Say We? An analysis of the production of difference to be included
This study aims to establish an analysis about the agencies which produce the difference to be included. Based on the suspicion that the overuse of the pronoun we in widely different speeches that intend to make a difference through advocacy of the inclusion consists of an abstraction of particulari...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositorio: | Educação & Realidade |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/17565 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/17565 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Diferença a Ser Incluída. Dispositivos de Proteção. Consenso. Evidências Identitárias. Biopolítica. Difference to be Included. Protective Devices. Consensus. Evidence of Identity. Biopolitics. |
| Sumario: | This study aims to establish an analysis about the agencies which produce the difference to be included. Based on the suspicion that the overuse of the pronoun we in widely different speeches that intend to make a difference through advocacy of the inclusion consists of an abstraction of particularity mechanism, also from contingency and occupying positions of power who enunciates these speeches, I try to show how they fit in and do not appear to offer significant resistance to forms of overlap between disciplinary power and normalization biopolitical power in contemporary societies. This will therefore imply a criticism of evidence of identity. This identity is admitted by the various minority movements. |
|---|