As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
The Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) text is unanimously, in terms of law theory, the most appropriate among Kant publications. This is because, besides exposing in a improved manner the main ideas developed in the previous writings and the complete division of law, he presents the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
| Repositorio: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufc:article/18953 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Filosofia do direito. Filosofia transcendental. Método. Liberdade. Semântica jurídica. Law philosophy. Transcendental philosophy. Method. Freedom. Juridical semantics. |
| Sumario: | The Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) text is unanimously, in terms of law theory, the most appropriate among Kant publications. This is because, besides exposing in a improved manner the main ideas developed in the previous writings and the complete division of law, he presents the metaphysical principles of right (Metaphysics) and application to particular cases (law empiric application). However, the determination of space in this text, from 1797, inside the transcendental philosophy project is not univocal. The two most important authors in this discussion about the criticism of the late Kantian juridical doctrine were Ritter (1971) e Busch (1979). The aim of this article is, firstly, to analyze both theses in order to, then, endorse the interpretation that defends Rechtslehre composition in accordance to the critical project of the first Kritik and the adaptations of the second Kritik. |
|---|