Sperm nuclear apoptotic DNA fragmentation in men with testicular cancer

Objective: To verify whether sperm from patients with a semi noma and patients with a non-semi noma present with an increased rate of apoptotic DNA fragmentation, when compared with men without testicular cancer and who had fathered a child in the 2 years preceding the study.Design: Controlled prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ribeiro, Taisa Michelucci [UNIFESP], Bertolla, Ricardo Pimenta [UNIFESP], Spaine, Deborah Montagnini [UNIFESP], Fraietta, Renato [UNIFESP], Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP], Cedenho, Agnaldo Pereira [UNIFESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2008
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/30975
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.012
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30975
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Testicular cancer
infertility
sperm
DNA fragmentation
TUNEL assay
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To verify whether sperm from patients with a semi noma and patients with a non-semi noma present with an increased rate of apoptotic DNA fragmentation, when compared with men without testicular cancer and who had fathered a child in the 2 years preceding the study.Design: Controlled prospective study.Setting: Patients referred to a sperm bank in an academic research environment.Patient(s): Men with a diagnosed seminoma, men with a diagnosed non-seminoma, both after orchiectomy and before adjuvant therapy, and men with proven paternity in the 2 previous years.Main Outcome Measure(s): Rate of nuclear apoptotic sperm DNA fragmentation as assessed by TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling) assay, classified as positive (with DNA fragmentation) or negative (without DNA fragmentation).Result(s): of the 48 men with testicular cancer included in the study, 29 (60.4%) presented a non-seminoma and 19 (39.6%) a seminoma. Patients with non-seminoma presented with lower progressive sperm motility than the control group (57.4% and 66.3%, respectively), but both were still within normal ranges. Sperm concentration was lower in seminoma (31.2 x 10(6)/mL) and in non-seminoma (20.6 x 10(6)/mL) when compared with the control group (78.1 x 10(6)/mL), but values did not differ between the two testicular cancer groups. Sperm morphology was lower in patients with non-seminoma than in the control group (10% and 13.1%, respectively). Results for sperm nuclear apoptotic DNA fragmentation (mean; standard deviation) were 12.6%; 4.5% for the control group, 12.2%; 5.5% for the non-seminoma group, and 12.5%; 6.4% for the seminoma group. No differences were found between the three groups.Conclusion(s): Our results demonstrate that the presence of a seminoma or a non-seminoma is not associated with an increase in sperm apoptotic DNA fragmentation. (Fertil Steril((R)) 2008;90:1782-6. (c) 2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)