A comparative analysis of the concepts of subordination and raciality
I intend to reflect to what extent Vivek Chibber's criticism of Indian subordinate studies is valid for thinking about the theoretical contributions of Peruvian sociologist Aníbal Quijano. A question will be fundamental to think of the so-called decolonial phase of Quijano: Like subaltern studi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| Repositorio: | Temáticas (Campinas. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/11104 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/11104 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Subalternidad Racialidad Capitalismo Subalternity Raciality Capitalism Subalternidade Racialidade |
| Sumario: | I intend to reflect to what extent Vivek Chibber's criticism of Indian subordinate studies is valid for thinking about the theoretical contributions of Peruvian sociologist Aníbal Quijano. A question will be fundamental to think of the so-called decolonial phase of Quijano: Like subaltern studies, Quijano proposes an explanation of the singularity of capitalist development in the periphery, for Indians subalternity is a central concept for understanding colonial and post-Independence India, for Quijano, raciality is crucial to understanding Latin American capitalism and the formation of states in this region, what are the affinities and differences between the two concepts? |
|---|