Internet of Things and blockchain used in the Brazilian Unified Health System: how to protect sensitive data considering the imminence of the Data Protection Law
Objective: Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, in Portuguese) has invested in Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to collect data from patients. This article aims to point out the weaknesses regarding the privacy of users of the SUS and to propose a theoretical solution, yet to be evaluated, and...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
| Repositorio: | Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/657 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/657 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cadena de bloques Privacidad Macrodatos Sistema Único de Salud Confidencialidad Blockchain Privacy Big data Unified Health System Confidentiality Privacidade Sistema Único de Saúde Confidencialidade |
| Sumario: | Objective: Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, in Portuguese) has invested in Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to collect data from patients. This article aims to point out the weaknesses regarding the privacy of users of the SUS and to propose a theoretical solution, yet to be evaluated, and based on a Personal Data Storages (PDS) infrastructure or on blockchain security. Methods: aA narrative review of national and international literature related to instruments, policies, and cases related to information and communication technologies in health was conducted to point out the weaknesses regarding the privacy of users of this system. Results: there is still a lack of transparency in the treatment of personal data and little accountability on the part of citizens, making it necessary to change the technological and governance strategy. Conclusion: PDS empowers users as it gives greater control and transparency over the treatment of data. However, this solution, in a system like the one used by their Computer Department, can compromise the accuracy of the data used in public policies, while it can compromise some citizens' rights, as this data is saved in records and the metadata is publicly available. The implementation of a solution like this does not yet have the prospect of an optimal result, without any methodological restriction on citizens' rights or the efficiency of the State, but it is a step in civil empowerment and an improvement required by law concerning privacy and protection of personal data. The implementation of the PDS does not yet have the prospect of an optimal result. There are still methodological restrictions regarding the rights of citizens or the efficiency of the State. But it is a step in civil empowerment and an improvement required by law in terms of privacy and the protection of personal data. |
|---|