Scientific method and postmodern paradigms: Reflection on an archaeological method of communication analysis
This article intends to reflect on a methodology for analyzing the relationship between Postmodernity and communication. This search aims to strengthen a method that can help the understanding of the organization of postmodern society, related to the use of the media. To fulfill these objectives, it...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Prometeica (Mar del Plata) |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15193 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/prometeica/article/view/15193 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | comunicación método posmodernidad arqueología communication method postmodernity archeology comunicação pós-modernidade arqueologia Método |
| Sumario: | This article intends to reflect on a methodology for analyzing the relationship between Postmodernity and communication. This search aims to strengthen a method that can help the understanding of the organization of postmodern society, related to the use of the media. To fulfill these objectives, it is intended to start from the views of Marshall Mcluhan, in the studies of the media; Michael Foucault, his Archeology of Knowledge and the constitution of the paradigm of an epoch; and by Giorgio Agamben and his method based on the relationship between paradigm, archeology and signature. This debate becomes relevant so that it is possible to develop a scientific method of Communication Sciences, so questioned in the contemporary context of academic knowledge. |
|---|