Tradução e adaptação transcultural do adolescent asthma self-efficacy questionnaire e asthma knowledge questionnaire para o português do Brasil e análise de suas propriedades de medida

Introduction: Some scales assess the self-efficacy of asthmatics, but do not take into account issues related to age and the use of correct medications. Objective: To translate, adapt cross-culturally to the Portuguese and test the measurement properties of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Berdu, Nathalia Ribeiro
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
Repositorio:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:localhost:tede/3538
Acceso en línea:http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/3538
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:autoeficácia
asma
questionários
self-efficacy
asthma
questionnaires
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Some scales assess the self-efficacy of asthmatics, but do not take into account issues related to age and the use of correct medications. Objective: To translate, adapt cross-culturally to the Portuguese and test the measurement properties of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AASEQ) and the Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (AKQ) for use in adolescents with asthma and in their parents/caregivers. Methods: The questionnaires were translated and adapted for the Portuguese. Its final versions were applied in two moments with an interval between seven and fourteen days. Reliability, agreement, construct validity and ceiling and floor effect were evaluated. Results: 135 adolescents (age 14 (age 12 – 16)) were evaluated, and the severity of mild asthma was evaluated in 63 (46.6%), with controlled symptoms in 90 (66.7%). The internal consistency of AASEQ and AKQ were substantial (Cronbach's alpha 0.70 and 0.73 respectively). The standard error of measurement was very good (SEM = 5.82 points and DMD90% = 6.68 points in the AASEQ, EPM = 2.65 points and DMD90% = 4.51 points in the AKQ), showing moderate reliability in the AASEQ ( ICC3.1: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.55 - 0.77], p<0.0001) and in the AKQ (CCI3.1: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.57 - 0.81], p<0.0001). The construct validity of the AASEQ was weak with the PedsQL (r= 0.28 and p < 0.05) and with the PAQLQA (r= 0.27 and p>0.05). The floor and ceiling effect were adequate in both questionnaires. Conclusion: The AASEQ and the AKQ are reliable tools for use in asthmatic adolescents and their caregivers.