Empirismo, perfectibilidade e ceticismo em Constant e Hume
The article investigates the different philosophical developments given to empiricism by Benjamin Constant and David Hume. For Constant, knowledge derived from sensations gives rise to a progressive and irreversible Philosophy of History. For Hume, this knowledge entails a philosophical skepticism t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/51407 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51407 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-4411 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Benjamin Constant David Hume Empirismo Perfectibilidade Ceticismo Constant, Benjamin, 1767-1830 Hume, David, 1711-1776 Aperfeiçoamento |
| Sumario: | The article investigates the different philosophical developments given to empiricism by Benjamin Constant and David Hume. For Constant, knowledge derived from sensations gives rise to a progressive and irreversible Philosophy of History. For Hume, this knowledge entails a philosophical skepticism that denies the idea of causality. Although they reason from empiricist assumptions and conclude radically different ideas, they both argue in a similar way when discussing the concepts of sacrifice and belief. |
|---|