THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE:: VYGOTSKY’S DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS REVISITED BY PSYCHOANALYSIS
This essay retrieves the Vygotskian ideas presented in “The genetic roots of thought and language” (Vigotsky, 2009[1934]) from the criticism reported by Bronckart (2006[1997]) in “Action, discourse and rationalization: Vygotsky’s developmental hypothesis revisited”. He therefore resumes the Bronckar...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) |
| Repositorio: | Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/9860 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/9860 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pensamento Linguagem Vygotski Interacionismo Sociodiscursivo Psicanálise Thought Language Vygotsky Sociodiscursive Interactionism Psychoanalysis Pensamiento Lenguaje Interaccionismo Sociodiscursivo Psicoanálisis |
| Sumario: | This essay retrieves the Vygotskian ideas presented in “The genetic roots of thought and language” (Vigotsky, 2009[1934]) from the criticism reported by Bronckart (2006[1997]) in “Action, discourse and rationalization: Vygotsky’s developmental hypothesis revisited”. He therefore resumes the Bronckartian appreciation of Vygotsky’s developmental hypothesis, taking a fresh look at the genesis of language and human thought based on Winnicott’s psychoanalysis (1975, 1983, 1990, 2000, 2011, 2012). The results suggest a reconfiguration that privileges, in a more complete and explicit way, social interactions and environmental provisions in the ontogenesis of thought and language, rejecting the Vygotskian hypothesis of disjunct roots and its “Y” development scheme. |
|---|