Correlação entre doença inflamatória intestinal e doença do refluxo gastroesofágico - revisão de literatura

The enteric nervous system and immune system interact intensely in healthy individuals and in various intestinal diseases. The existence of a relationship between intestinal and esophageal motility is being studied since the end of the 19th century. Several studies have already demonstrated the incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Almeida, Saulo Santiago
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/40684
Acceso en línea:http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/40684
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Refluxo gastroesofágico
Motilidade intestinal
Descripción
Sumario:The enteric nervous system and immune system interact intensely in healthy individuals and in various intestinal diseases. The existence of a relationship between intestinal and esophageal motility is being studied since the end of the 19th century. Several studies have already demonstrated the increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, there is little reference to the relationship between GERD and inflamatory bowel disease (IBD). Although they are distinct entities, IBD and GERD present changes in gastrointestinal motility whose pathogenesis is not fully known and may be related. Our main objective is to gather information available in the literature on esophageal motility alterations in patients with IBD. For this, we carried out a review of the literature in 4 databases between 1990 and 2018. Initially, 316 articles were found, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. We observed that in the majority of studies, there was a higher prevalence of GERD patients with IBD, and the intensity of reflux symptoms was lower when compared to the control group.