Qualidade da carne de perus (Meleagris gallopavo) submetidos a diferentes sistemas de ventilação durante a engorda

The present investigation evaluated the quality of turkey meat produced in two production systems, according to the following parameters: water loss in cooking, drip water loss, texture (shear strength), pH, color, humidity, protein, ashes and lipids. A total of 200 turkey breast samples of 500 g, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Marcon, Diego Francisco, Crecencio, Regiane Boaretto, de Castro, Tanize Angonesi, Budel, Leidiane Josi, Ramirez-Fernandez, Francisco Javier, Starikoff, Karina Ramirez
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Brasil
Institución:Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP)
Repositorio:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usp.br:article/142527
Acceso en línea:https://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/142527
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Quality of turkey meat
Ventilation in the production of turkeys
Ventilation systems
Meleagris gallopavo
Qualidade da carne de peru
Ventilação na produção de perus
Sistemas de ventilação
Descripción
Sumario:The present investigation evaluated the quality of turkey meat produced in two production systems, according to the following parameters: water loss in cooking, drip water loss, texture (shear strength), pH, color, humidity, protein, ashes and lipids. A total of 200 turkey breast samples of 500 g, separated by a batch of 20 samples, from ten aviaries from Santa Catarina, Brazil, were used: five from breeding with a traditional ventilation system and five with a mechanical ventilation system. Samples were obtained after slaughter and frozen at -15°C for 30 days. The results were submitted to variance analysis and the Tukey test. Significant differences were found only in the analysis of drip water loss. The birds of the traditional ventilation system presented 14.26% loss of water drip, while those of the ventilation exhaust system presented a loss of 19.21%. There were no differences in the chemical composition of poultry meat in relation to the production systems.