Movimentos intertextuais na configuração do plágio
This paper discusses an intertextual constitution of plagiarism. The assumptions supported by Christofe (1996), Cavalcante and Brito (2011), Nobre (2014) and Koch (2009) use as an example or plan activities of intertextual movements that are typical of other intertextual processes (quote, paraphrase...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
| Repositório: | Revista Investigações (Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/244472 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/INV/article/view/244472 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | linguistique textuelle intertextualité plagiat. linguística textual intertextualidade plágio. |
| Resumo: | This paper discusses an intertextual constitution of plagiarism. The assumptions supported by Christofe (1996), Cavalcante and Brito (2011), Nobre (2014) and Koch (2009) use as an example or plan activities of intertextual movements that are typical of other intertextual processes (quote, paraphrase, parody and pastiche) to manifest. This reality provides multiple practical ways to organize the disguise of the plagiarism text and maintain the source text. An analysis compares a text accused of plagiarism with its source text, demonstrating, based on functional and constitutional norms (NOBRE, 2014), how this phenomenon can be composed through the intertextual movements of the parody. |
|---|