Impuro, imperfeito, impermanente
Starting from brief introductory considerations regarding the epistemological transition of thecartesian subject to the freudian suject, with emphasis on the rupture and subversion of thepsychoanalytic discourse as the production of a new knowledge at the beggining of the XXcentury, the present arti...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Perspectivas em Psicologia (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/52207 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/perspectivasempsicologia/article/view/52207 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sujeito freudiano Lenine Vivo Freudian subject |
| Sumario: | Starting from brief introductory considerations regarding the epistemological transition of thecartesian subject to the freudian suject, with emphasis on the rupture and subversion of thepsychoanalytic discourse as the production of a new knowledge at the beggining of the XXcentury, the present article intends to make an analysis of excertps of the song “Vivo”, recordedon the first album titled “In Cité” (2004) by Lenine a brazilian singer and songwriter that in aningenuity as poetic synthesis, throws himself in the forcing of a series of adjective words, in afirst time disjointed and unconnected, to in the end, compose the ontological picture of a subjectmarked by the fragmentation of himself and that despite this fragmentation and incompleteness,remains alive, strange, displaced and presente here. |
|---|