About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil

The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ponce, Branca Jurema, Silva, Cicero Barbosa da, Sousa, Jose dos Santos, Anjos, Daniela, Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos, Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May, Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de, Freitas, Silvana Alves, Pietri, Emerson de, Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli, Camargo, Evani, Branco, Jordanna Castelo, Bizelli, Jose Luis, Siman, Lana Mara de Castro, Muzzeti, Luci Regina, Reis, Magali dos, Martins, Edna, Bissoto, Maria Luisa, Castro, Monica Rabelo de, Gimenes, Nelson, Gualtieri, Regina, Silva, Regis, Ribeiro, Ricardo, Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:Brasil
Institución:Fundação Cesgranrio
Repositorio:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Idioma:portugués
inglés
español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.localhost:article/1652
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES
editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES
proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES
Descripción
Sumario:The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals.

Similares en LA Referencia