Wolves and sheep: crossed between criminal knowledge, elimination of other and human dignity
The purpose of this article is to question the applicability of the criminal reprimand that has the sole purpose of social control and pacification, or has as background the blockade of another, or offender, public living pact. My hypothesis is that the evolution of class society, fixes penalty mech...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Penal e Política Criminal |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/96370 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/redppc/article/view/96370 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Exclusão Pena Moral Dignidade humana Exclusion Criminal sanction Human dignity |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this article is to question the applicability of the criminal reprimand that has the sole purpose of social control and pacification, or has as background the blockade of another, or offender, public living pact. My hypothesis is that the evolution of class society, fixes penalty mechanisms that have intelligence privileges or median wealth andexcludes vulnerable beings that do not conform to positive norms, are more susceptible to criminal prosecution and sanctions. A brief digression will also be made into the historical roots of the applicability of punishment in order to demonstrate the ambivalence of humanity over the centuries, in two necessarily excluding poles, one dominant and the other dominated, in an almost permanent tension for the maintenance of power and for survival. |
|---|