Media Operations and Criminal Procedure: Respect for Fundamental Rights as a Legitimizing Factor of Judicial Decision in Criminal Cases
Starting from the premise that the parties in criminal proceedings has the right to be informed and participate in equal conditions, the judge fit tutelary intensely the adversarial principle laid down by the Constitution of 1988. Assuming, therefore, the criminal proceedings a more democratic bias...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/466 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/466 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fundamental right Media operations Criminal proceedings Judicial decisions Direitos fundamentais Operações midiáticas Processo penal Decisões judiciais |
| Sumario: | Starting from the premise that the parties in criminal proceedings has the right to be informed and participate in equal conditions, the judge fit tutelary intensely the adversarial principle laid down by the Constitution of 1988. Assuming, therefore, the criminal proceedings a more democratic bias has been the need to change the dogmatic to ensure effectiveness of fundamental rights, especially since the environment in which they formed the main rules of criminal law and procedure was in the 1940s. |
|---|