A Oficina de Vídeo como potência de pesquisa em Psicologia: luz, câmera, criação!
This paper aims to address the Video Workshop as a device that enhances the Intervention-Research, bringing to light elements of the dissertation research experience entitled The Practice Prejudice and Tolerance in the school context: the other as a matter, in which a theoretical-methodological pers...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/27940 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/27940 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pesquisa-intervenção Oficina de Vídeo Escola Intervention-research |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to address the Video Workshop as a device that enhances the Intervention-Research, bringing to light elements of the dissertation research experience entitled The Practice Prejudice and Tolerance in the school context: the other as a matter, in which a theoretical-methodological perspective of Intervention-Research was crafted using the video workshop device. Initially, it discusses the main theoretical references of Intervention-Research, based on main Brazilian and foreign theorists on the topic as Marisa Lopes da Rocha, Simone Paulon and René Lourau. The second topic briefly presents the aforementioned dissertation research. Afterwards, we address the use of the Video Workshop device within the research process, when we worked with students both the exhibition and the production of videos that addressed the issue. Altogether we had thirteen meetings in the Video Workshop. As a result, we have seen how the Video Workshop was important in the research process, since it made possible the co authorship and narration of experience, in addition to being a device that brought a questioning about the own resistance within the research process. |
|---|