‘Imbalanced modernity’ and ‘Caesarism’: : Gramscian categories to think through the crises of democracy
This article presents a reflection - supported by the Gramscian theoretical and methodological categories of unbalanced modernity and Caesarism, thought of in a ‘post-totalitarian’ way - on the transformations and deep contradictions brought about by the ‘dualist’ North-South development model, havi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) |
| Repositorio: | Conhecer (Fortaleza) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.uece.br:article/7836 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/7836 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | modernidade desequilibrada cesarismo nápoles achille lauro unbalanced modernity caesarism naples modernidad desequilibrada aquiles lauro modernité déséquilibrée césarisme achille laure |
| Sumario: | This article presents a reflection - supported by the Gramscian theoretical and methodological categories of unbalanced modernity and Caesarism, thought of in a ‘post-totalitarian’ way - on the transformations and deep contradictions brought about by the ‘dualist’ North-South development model, having as a privileged focus the right-wings in the government of Naples and Italy’s ‘Meridione’ at the time of the post-World War II reconstruction. |
|---|