DESIGNING THE PATH OF MANIPULATION
From the perspective of Greimasian Semiotics, the present work intends to contribute to the theory by designing a scheme of the path of the manipulation and detailing its stages. Based on the works of Barros (2002 and 2005) and Greimas (2014 [1980]) and Greimas and Courtés (2008) we believe that the...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
| Repositorio: | Acta Semiótica et Lingvistica (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufpb.br:article/66295 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/actas/article/view/66295 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Semiótica Greimasiana Percurso da Manipulação Esquema |
| Sumario: | From the perspective of Greimasian Semiotics, the present work intends to contribute to the theory by designing a scheme of the path of the manipulation and detailing its stages. Based on the works of Barros (2002 and 2005) and Greimas (2014 [1980]) and Greimas and Courtés (2008) we believe that the manipulative itinerary is instituted when the sender-manipulator proposes (idealizes) a narrative program that intends that the recipient - manipulated perform. This intersubjective relationship is mediated, initially, by wanting. Therefore, the manipulator idealizes the modal competence of the recipient-manipulated on the intended action, establishes the fiduciary contract and the values inscribed therein and executes the persuasion (make-know), thus constituting his persuasive action (make-believe); finally, the recipient-manipulator interprets (believes) the persuasive action of the addresser-manipulator through his/her interpretive action, an instance ad quem of the course of manipulation. |
|---|