Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach
The purpose of this paper is to present the main heterodox (not determinist) contributions to the time approach in economics. Also it is looking for to compare the dominant (determinist) view with the not determinist one. In addition, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the reasons why th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | EDITORA 34 |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Economia Política |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.centrodeeconomiapolitica.org:article/59 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/59 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Tempo Incerteza Irreversibilidade Diacronismo Ex ante e Ex post Time Uncertainty Irreversibility Diachronism Ex ante and Ex post |
| id |
BR_57ed66712b8f5e430c1184171a5187de |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.centrodeeconomiapolitica.org:article/59 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approachNotas para a discussão do tempo na economia: uma modelagem heterodoxaTempoIncertezaIrreversibilidadeDiacronismoEx ante e Ex postTimeUncertaintyIrreversibilityDiachronismEx ante and Ex postThe purpose of this paper is to present the main heterodox (not determinist) contributions to the time approach in economics. Also it is looking for to compare the dominant (determinist) view with the not determinist one. In addition, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the reasons why the deterministic approach of time is still dominant -and perhaps hegemonic- among the economists. This circumstance has remained so despite the fact that the alternative view (not deterministic) has proved to be most appropriate to its object and it has been gaining importance and significant attention in a wide range of scientific disciplines. This article seeks to advance an explanatory hypothesis for this paradoxical and intriguing situation, without claim to offer, however, a complete or definitive answer to this important and intricate issue. JEL Classification: B2; B5; B4; B1.O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar as principais contribuições heterodoxas (não deterministas) para a abordagem do tempo, em economia, e contrapô-las ao enfoque dominante. Adicionalmente, busca-se contribuir para o entendimento das razões pelas quais a concepção determinista do tempo ainda é dominante -e talvez hegemônica- entre os economistas. Esta situação tem permanecido assim apesar do fato de que a abordagem alternativa (não determinista) tenha se revelado mais adequada ao seu objeto e venha ganhando importância e atenção significativa em uma ampla gama de disciplinas científicas. Este artigo procura avançar uma hipótese explicativa para esta situação paradoxal e intrigante, sem ter, entretanto, a pretensão de dar uma resposta completa ou definitiva para esta importante e intricada questão. Classificação JEL: B2; B5; B4; B1.Center of Political Economy2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/5910.1590/0101-31572018v38n01a09Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2018): Jan-Mar / 2018; 150-166Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; v. 38 n. 1 (2018): Jan-Mar / 2018; 150-1661809-45380101-3157reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_34porhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/59/55info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessG. de Carvalho, Enéas2020-10-13T17:33:59Zoai:ojs2.centrodeeconomiapolitica.org:article/59Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2020-10-13T17:33:59Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach Notas para a discussão do tempo na economia: uma modelagem heterodoxa |
| title |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| spellingShingle |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach G. de Carvalho, Enéas Tempo Incerteza Irreversibilidade Diacronismo Ex ante e Ex post Time Uncertainty Irreversibility Diachronism Ex ante and Ex post |
| title_short |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| title_full |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| title_fullStr |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| title_sort |
Notes for the discussion of time in economics: a heterodox approach |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
G. de Carvalho, Enéas |
| author |
G. de Carvalho, Enéas |
| author_facet |
G. de Carvalho, Enéas |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tempo Incerteza Irreversibilidade Diacronismo Ex ante e Ex post Time Uncertainty Irreversibility Diachronism Ex ante and Ex post |
| topic |
Tempo Incerteza Irreversibilidade Diacronismo Ex ante e Ex post Time Uncertainty Irreversibility Diachronism Ex ante and Ex post |
| description |
The purpose of this paper is to present the main heterodox (not determinist) contributions to the time approach in economics. Also it is looking for to compare the dominant (determinist) view with the not determinist one. In addition, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the reasons why the deterministic approach of time is still dominant -and perhaps hegemonic- among the economists. This circumstance has remained so despite the fact that the alternative view (not deterministic) has proved to be most appropriate to its object and it has been gaining importance and significant attention in a wide range of scientific disciplines. This article seeks to advance an explanatory hypothesis for this paradoxical and intriguing situation, without claim to offer, however, a complete or definitive answer to this important and intricate issue. JEL Classification: B2; B5; B4; B1. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/59 10.1590/0101-31572018v38n01a09 |
| url |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/59 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-31572018v38n01a09 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/59/55 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center of Political Economy |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center of Political Economy |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2018): Jan-Mar / 2018; 150-166 Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; v. 38 n. 1 (2018): Jan-Mar / 2018; 150-166 1809-4538 0101-3157 reponame:Revista de Economia Política instname:EDITORA 34 instacron:EDITORA_34 |
| instname_str |
EDITORA 34 |
| instacron_str |
EDITORA_34 |
| institution |
EDITORA_34 |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
| collection |
Revista de Economia Política |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br |
| _version_ |
1853662460114894848 |
| score |
15,127367 |