The challenge of the quality and integrity of scientific publications
The increasing importance of the sciences raises issues related to the validity, veracity, relevance, usefulness, accountability and sustainability of the products of scientific practice. Therefore, practices that compromise the integrity of scientific research are fundamental, both by researchers a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade (SBMFC) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.rbmfc.org.br:article/1434 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/1434 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Scientific Publication Ethics. Scientific Misconduct. Peer Review.Plagiarism Ética en la Publicación Científica. Mala Conducta Científica. Revisión por Expertos. Plagio Ética na Publicação Científica. Má Conduta Científica. Revisão por pares. Plágio |
| Sumario: | The increasing importance of the sciences raises issues related to the validity, veracity, relevance, usefulness, accountability and sustainability of the products of scientific practice. Therefore, practices that compromise the integrity of scientific research are fundamental, both by researchers and by scientific journals. In 2016, the Brazilian Journal of Family and Community Medicine (RBMFC) refused 14 papers that had problems with plagiarism, which represents approximately 10% of the submissions of the year. We consider this a serious problem that requires greater attention and care from authors who intend to contribute to the journal. The editorial policy of RBMFC values the quality of its publications, respecting internationally accepted ethical principles and integrity of scientific research. |
|---|