História e memória do Programa de Educação Tutorial em Pedagogia
This study aims to investigate the history of the Pedagogy Tutorial Education Program (PET) of the Faculty of Education (Faced) at the Federal University of Ceará (UFC). PET Pedagogy is a long-term program, which aims to foster an emancipatory model of education, in which students have the freedom t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/82927 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/82927 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO História Memória Programa de Educação Tutorial History Memory Tutorial Education Program |
| Sumario: | This study aims to investigate the history of the Pedagogy Tutorial Education Program (PET) of the Faculty of Education (Faced) at the Federal University of Ceará (UFC). PET Pedagogy is a long-term program, which aims to foster an emancipatory model of education, in which students have the freedom to choose the training path most appropriate to their worldview, providing, in this sense, means and support mechanisms for the completeness of a visionary education. To this end, the research is based on the concept of memory as the meeting of the past in the present and on the construction of history as a science that produces systematized and methodical knowledge, as well as on lived experience to absorb new learning. In the methodology, qualitative research was used as a way of understanding the subjectivity of the study subjects. The technique used was the questionnaire as a source for data acquisition and the information collected was verified through content analysis, with the formulation of guiding categories of the main aspects that were collected. In the discussions we found memories that define PET Pedagogy as a social educator, in addition to characteristics that corroborate its importance at the undergraduate level and many contributions that emphasize the quality training proposed by the Program. In the final considerations, we note that it is the movements of each scholarship holder that make the Program exist as a training entity. Evoking the memory of lived experiences transports us back in time, connecting our personal history with UFC, FACED and PET, especially with PET Pedagogy. |
|---|