Law, hermeneutics and artificial intelligence: building bridges between judicial decision, existential understanding and machine learning mechanisms
This text discusses the overlap between Law, Hermeneutics and Artificial Intelligence (I.A.): thehermeneutic possibility of constructing judicial decisions based on machine learning mechanisms.The text describes hermeneutic thinking, which is a thinking that meditates, able to understand,understand...
| Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
| Repository: | Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/64105 |
| Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64105 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Keywords Artificial Intelligence - Machine Learning - Thinking Hermeneutic - Artificial Hermeneutics. |
| Summary: | This text discusses the overlap between Law, Hermeneutics and Artificial Intelligence (I.A.): thehermeneutic possibility of constructing judicial decisions based on machine learning mechanisms.The text describes hermeneutic thinking, which is a thinking that meditates, able to understand,understand and question the very existence of being, and, when describing concepts linked to AI andmachine learning, it seeks to imbricate Hermeneutics and AI, trying to verify whether or not it ispossible to construct hermeneutically judicial decisions based on AI mechanisms, given the difficultyof the machine to think hermeneutically. The purpose of this text, therefore, is to seek to affirmwhether or not there is already a possibility of reconciling Law, Hermeneutics and AI, in the sensethat the machine delivers judicial decisions that are better than those of the judge, insofar as it cancontain judicial subjectivity. always present in decisions. |
|---|