The “barbarity” as a contradiction of “Democracy Consensual”: brief dialogue with the Human Rights acclaimed post 1945
The practice of “barbarity” by the United Totalitarian the 2nd GM , which in its final stage led to the collapse of these schemes, did emerge strengthening democracy in the world after the year 1945, interpellating global policies for the establishment of “Human Rights”. Relying on the concept of “D...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Temporalidades |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/5797 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/temporalidades/article/view/5797 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Democracia barbárie direitos humanos. Democracy Barbarism Human Rights |
| Sumario: | The practice of “barbarity” by the United Totalitarian the 2nd GM , which in its final stage led to the collapse of these schemes, did emerge strengthening democracy in the world after the year 1945, interpellating global policies for the establishment of “Human Rights”. Relying on the concept of “Democracy Consensual” Jacques Rancière, the emergence of a democratic regime should represent the guarantee of justice of political forms, but the appropriation of democracy as a state regime into question democracy itself, with the criticism of design and perspective of universalizing democracy promovedora of “Human rights”. So historically we see the contradiction of the West incorporating terror actions, trying to justify them in the light of a progressive and humanitarian discourse. |
|---|