Formar Pesquisadores Interdisciplinares Form Reserchears Interdisciplinary
This paper aims to reflect on the issues of interdisciplinarity from the challenge faced in the last forty years to train interdisciplinary researchers. Since the enactment of the Law of Guidelines and Bases of National Education, in the 1970s, the effort is visible which has been doing in trying to...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNITAU |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unitau.br:20.500.11874/3097 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/3097 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Interdisciplinarity Reserchears Form Interdisciplinary Atitude Social Work |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to reflect on the issues of interdisciplinarity from the challenge faced in the last forty years to train interdisciplinary researchers. Since the enactment of the Law of Guidelines and Bases of National Education, in the 1970s, the effort is visible which has been doing in trying to be effective curricula and interdisciplinary practices, with a view to overcoming the knowledge fragmentation and integration of knowledge. However, we have to think also about the aspects that involve the formation of interdisciplinary researcher, from the following questions: what is to be interdisciplinary? What is interdisciplinary attitude? How are interdisciplinary researchers? It is believed that this is a process that builds on the ambiguity of the partnership and loneliness. The researcher moves towards a knowledge be interdisciplinary in that it becomes partner of his colleagues, also researchers, and together they start to reflect, to study and collectively plan on their research to the same extent that they gather in silence their spaces and are dedicated to solitary writing about everything they thought they saw, and collected. This exercise requires opening for criticism, for display, to allow their work to be put to the test, so that the knowledge revealed it can be considered, in fact, interdisciplinary. |
|---|