Income distribution according to Brazilian household surveys: harmonization and comparison of Census, PNAD and POF data

The aim of this paper is to document and explain the differences in income distribution in three Brazilian household surveys: the Demographic Census, the National Household Sample Survey (PNAD - Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios) and the Family Budgets Survey (POF - Pesquisa de Orçamentos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Souza, Pedro Herculano Guimarães Ferreira de
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:Brasil
Institución:Associação Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais (ABEP)
Repositorio:Revista brasileira de estudos de população (Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.rebep.org.br:article/699
Acceso en línea:https://rebep.org.br/revista/article/view/699
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Household surveys
Income measurement
Income distribution
Inequality
Poverty
Encuestas de hogares
Medición de los ingresos
Distribución del ingreso
Desigualdad
Pobreza
Pesquisas domiciliares
Mensuração da renda
Distribuição de renda
Desigualdade
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this paper is to document and explain the differences in income distribution in three Brazilian household surveys: the Demographic Census, the National Household Sample Survey (PNAD - Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios) and the Family Budgets Survey (POF - Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares). The main hypothesis is that it is possible to achieve great convergence of results in the aforementioned surveys with ex post harmonization procedures that minimize, as far as possible, discrepancies in sampling design, in concepts, and in data collection and treatment. The results confirm, to a large extent, this hypothesis: in general, harmonization approximates the three surveys and significantly reduces the major discrepancies between income distributions, in particular concerning Census vs. PNAD comparisons. Although, in some cases, differences persist in the levels of income, inequality and poverty, their tendencies over time become remarkably similar in the three surveys. Finally, it is observed that the remaining discrepancies follow a pattern: even after harmonization, income distribution in PNADs tends to be a little more egalitarian than in Censuses and in POFs, that is, the poorest families have higher incomes and the richest families have lower incomes.DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-30982015000000009