Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity
This essay discusses participative governance mechanisms in the public sector grounded on theories of civil liberties, dialogical democracies, patterns of state bureaucracies, and public governance reforms. We aimed to analyze the effects of these issues on political agendas and public and parti...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
| Repositorio: | Saude em Debate |
| Idioma: | portugués inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/7289 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Governança. Burocracia estatal. Participação societária. Governance. State bureaucracy. Societal institutions. |
| Sumario: | This essay discusses participative governance mechanisms in the public sector grounded on theories of civil liberties, dialogical democracies, patterns of state bureaucracies, and public governance reforms. We aimed to analyze the effects of these issues on political agendas and public and participative governance alternatives in Brazil, emphasizing conflicts among rulers, politicians, civil servants, interest groups, and advocacy coalitions in dispute in decision-making processes. The article signals a hybrid nature of the Brazilian democracy in which Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in the 1988 constitutional matrix operate through competition between two other logic streams – strata inheritance of state bureaucracy on the one hand and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governance on the other. The article signals for a hybrid character of Brazilian democracy where Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in 1988 constitutional operates through competition between two logics – stratum inheritance of state bureaucracy in one side, and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governances to the other side. Dynamic contradictions among these for issues will define the pattern of present competition for State apparatus. |
|---|