ALTERNATIVES TO REDUCING THE INCOME TAX RETURN OF INDIVIDUALS IN BRAZIL
Brazil, in the recent past, has not programmed the reduction of income inequalitiesthrough a progressive tax policy. On the contrary, in the 1990s, it followed theguidelines of Multilateral Organizations such as the International Monetary Fund, toreduce the marginal rates of Personal Income Tax (IRP...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositorio: | Análise Econômica (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/82019 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/82019 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Income tax Tax regressiveness Fiscal justice H00 H2 H24 Imposto de Renda Regressividade Tributária Justiça fiscal |
| Resumo: | Brazil, in the recent past, has not programmed the reduction of income inequalitiesthrough a progressive tax policy. On the contrary, in the 1990s, it followed theguidelines of Multilateral Organizations such as the International Monetary Fund, toreduce the marginal rates of Personal Income Tax (IRPF), further restricting the distributiverole of this tax and, in the years 2000, opted from the perspective of spending, as analternative to the reduction of income inequality in the country. Given this and the viewof the Theory of Equitable Taxation and from the constitutional principles of isonomyand contributory capacity the regressivity of the IRPF is analyzed in spite of progressivemarginal rates. It is observed that the Effective Rate has a decreasing relation with the increase of income. From incomes above 40 SM, the higher the income, the lower the effective rate of the IRPF. While for taxpayers with income above 320 SM the effective income tax rate is 2.1%, for taxpayers with a income range between 30 and 40 SM, it is 10.5%, that is five times higher. From this, we present three simulations for the updating of the IRPF Table to cover the iniquities of this tax, consequently, increasing the collection and contributing with the confrontation of the fiscal crisis of the State. |
|---|