Effectiveness of lower-extremity functional training (lift) in young children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

Background. Children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) have strength, coordination, and balance deficits affecting gross motor skills, such as walking, running, and jumping. However, there is a paucity of evidence for effective treatments for lower-extremity (LE) function in children wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Bhavini Krunalkumar Surana, Claudio Luis Ferre, Ashley Dew, Marina de Brito Brandão, Andrew Michael Gordon, Noelle Moreau
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/40779
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1545968319868719
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/40779
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5192-0868
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8732-976X
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cerebral palsy
Motor learning
Muscle strength
Telemedicine
Hemiplegia
Gait
Rehabilitation
Balance
Telerehabilitation
Paralisia cerebral
Aprendizagem motora
Força muscular
Telemedicina
Marcha
Reabilitação neurológica
Equilibrio
Telerreabilitação
Descripción
Sumario:Background. Children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) have strength, coordination, and balance deficits affecting gross motor skills, such as walking, running, and jumping. However, there is a paucity of evidence for effective treatments for lower-extremity (LE) function in children with USCP. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of LE intensive functional training (LIFT) compared with an attention control group receiving upper-extremity bimanual training (Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy [H-HABIT]). Methods. A total of 24 children with USCP were randomized to receive 90 hours of LIFT (5.8 [2.3] years) or an equivalent dosage of H-HABIT (5.1 [2.6] years) delivered 2 h/d, 5 d/wk for 9 weeks. Caregivers were trained to administer the intervention in the home setting. Progress and skill progression were monitored, and supervision was provided via weekly telerehabilitation. The primary outcome was the 1-minute walk test (1MWT). Secondary outcomes included self-selected and fast walking speeds, ABILOCO-kids, 30-s chair rise test, and single-leg stance. Results. LIFT showed greater improvement for the 1MWT (P = .017) and ABILOCO-kids (P = .008) compared with controls. The other secondary outcomes were not different between groups. Conclusions. The administration of LE intensive interventions in the home setting by caregivers was shown to be an effective and novel mode of delivery for improving gait capacity and performance. LIFT delivered in the home setting using telerehabilitation for monitoring resulted in improvements in ambulation distance and overall walking ability as compared to an intervention of equal intensity and duration that also controlled for the increased social interaction and attention between caregiver and child.