"My Kingdom is not from this World”: Ronald Dworkin and the Challenge of Religion
ABSTRACT:The paper is a dialogue with Dworkin’s posthumous book, Religion Without God. Firstly, I intend to reconstruct accurately Dworkin’s argument in the book and in other recent writings, then I try to scrutinize how the dworkinian idea of a general right to ethical independence, instead of a sp...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
| Repositório: | Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/26738 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/26738 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Ronald Dworkin; Religion; Religious freedom; Robert George; Fundamental rights Teoria do Direito, Direito Constitucional, Filosofia Política Ronald Dworkin; Religião; Liberdade Religiosa; Robert George; Direitos Fundamentais Filosofia do Direito |
| Resumo: | ABSTRACT:The paper is a dialogue with Dworkin’s posthumous book, Religion Without God. Firstly, I intend to reconstruct accurately Dworkin’s argument in the book and in other recent writings, then I try to scrutinize how the dworkinian idea of a general right to ethical independence, instead of a special right to religious freedom, would apply in a concrete situation. Secondly, I analyze two objections that religious conservatives might advance against Dworkin’s liberal project. The first objection claims that the author unsuitably imports to religion a distinction between fact and value that is typical of philosophy, but not of religiosity. The second objection affirms that religion is a basic good of reflexive character, and not something individualistic as Dworkin defends. My conclusion is that religious freedom is a problem that demands a political solution, and that perhaps the most respectful position towards religion would recognize that some parts of it might be sacrificed in the name of other values we believe important. |
|---|