Reproducibility in pelvic floor biometric parameters of nulliparous women assessed by translabial three-dimensional ultrasound using Omniview reformatting technique

Aim: To assess the reproducibility of pelvic floor biometric parameters by translabial three-dimensional ultrasound compared with the OmniView (R) reformatting technique. Material and methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study involving 47 nulliparous women without symptoms of pelvic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Katalin Jarmy-Di Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona [UNIFESP], Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP], Rodrigues, Claudinei Alves [UNIFESP], Torelli, Luiza [UNIFESP], Martins, Wellington P. [UNIFESP], Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP], Castello Girao, Manoel Joao Batista [UNIFESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51105
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.zsu
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51105
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Pelvic floor
nulliparous
rendering mode
three-dimensional ultrasound
omniView (R)
Descripción
Sumario:Aim: To assess the reproducibility of pelvic floor biometric parameters by translabial three-dimensional ultrasound compared with the OmniView (R) reformatting technique. Material and methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study involving 47 nulliparous women without symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. The hiatal area and right pubovisceral muscle width measurements were performed in the axial plane using both 3D ultrasound in the rendering mode and OmniView (R) techniques. To determine the occurrence of standardized error between examiners and the two sonographic methods, the paired t-test was used. The intra-and inter-observer reliability and agreement were estimated by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and limits of agreement, respectively. Results: We did not observe significant statistical differences among both measurements performed by the first examiner, both examiners and both methods in the assessment of the hiatal area