In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm
This article seeks to analyze to what extent there is an adequacy between the ratio decidendi expressed in part of Brazilian jurisprudence and the principled guidelines that characterize the doctrine of full protection of children and adolescents, a normative framework of the 1988 Constitution. More...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
| Repositorio: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/85481 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Justiça juvenil. Justiça restaurativa. Doutrina da proteção integral. Jurisprudência. Hermenêutica. Juvenile justice. Restorative justice. Doctrine of integral protection. Jurisprudence. Hermeneutics. |
| Resumo: | This article seeks to analyze to what extent there is an adequacy between the ratio decidendi expressed in part of Brazilian jurisprudence and the principled guidelines that characterize the doctrine of full protection of children and adolescents, a normative framework of the 1988 Constitution. More specifically, the degree of adherence of Brazilian jurisprudence to the recommendation of prioritizing alternative forms of conflict resolution in the area of juvenile justice is examined. This will be done through the qualitative analysis of decisions handed down by Brazilian higher and state courts that work on the subject, between the years 2012 and 2019, selected according to criteria of region and impact. The analytical comparison considers the indicators developed by the Ibero-American Center for Children’s Rights (Santiago, Chile), specifically developed for this purpose in the context of Ibero-America. The results indicate the permanence of practices of “minorism”, which respond to the legacies of the tutelary stage of juvenile criminal law which, in turn, is in force in the Brazilian legal space in the legislation of the doctrine of the irregular situation of the 19th century. The framework, added to other aspects highlighted in the conclusion, poses important obstacles to the implementation of restorative practices in the field of juvenile justice. |
|---|