Análise de práticas de atenção ao parto e nascimento em maternidade pública

Objective: to analyze childbirth and birth care practices in a public maternity hospital. Methods: a crosssectional descriptive study made in a tertiary maternity hospital with 264 puerperal women. Collection proceeded by means of a form based on good childbirth care practices. Results: prevalence o...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Barros, Maria Aline Rodrigues, Sousa, Luana Silva de, Américo, Camila Félix, Esteche, Cinthia Maria Gomes da Costa Escoto, Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro, Vasconcelos, Flávia Ximenes
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/48212
Acesso em linha:http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/48212
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Parto Natural
Parto Humanizado
Enfermagem Obstétrica
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: to analyze childbirth and birth care practices in a public maternity hospital. Methods: a crosssectional descriptive study made in a tertiary maternity hospital with 264 puerperal women. Collection proceeded by means of a form based on good childbirth care practices. Results: prevalence of good childbirth care practices. It was observed that 233 (88.3%) received information, 256 (97.0%) had freedom of position, fetal monitoring occurred in 260 (98.5%), 198 (75.0%) used non-pharmacological pain relief methods, 263 (99.6%) were entitled to a companion, skin-to-skin contact in 258 (98.1%). Conclusion: practices such as early amniotomy and repeated touches were found that should be used with caution. In addition, the use of the Kristeller maneuver was verified, although in a low percentage, which should be eliminated from delivery care.