Analysis of relationships between different training load monitoring tools in elite U-20 soccer
Purpose. The study analysed the responses from different training load monitoring tools in the elite U-20 soccer category and checked the level of association between these responses. Methods. The participants were 10 elite male soccer players (age, 18.61 ± 0.95 years; height, 176.81 ± 5.03 cm; body...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/41036 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2018.81014 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/41036 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-1505 https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9264-8872 https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-7570-2694 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-4344 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-6405 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | GPS technology Training control Session-RPE Futebol - Treinamento técnico Jogadores de futebol |
| Sumario: | Purpose. The study analysed the responses from different training load monitoring tools in the elite U-20 soccer category and checked the level of association between these responses. Methods. The participants were 10 elite male soccer players (age, 18.61 ± 0.95 years; height, 176.81 ± 5.03 cm; body mass, 70.32 ± 8.41 kg). The progressive test to exhaustion assessed maximum oxygen consumption and maximum heart rate. The athletes were monitored over 15 training sessions with a heart-rate-based method (Edwards) and mechanical load indicators obtained from GPS devices (15 Hz). Results. Individual training load was calculated with the Foster’s session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) procedure. A significant correlation was found between session-RPE and Edwards (0.564, p < 0.05). There were no significant correlations between session-RPE and average speed (–0.161), average heart rate of the training session (–0.187), distance over 20 km/h (0.006), or number of accelerations performed in different zones (–0.194, –0.178, –0.171, –0.236). The Edwards method showed significant correlations with the total distance (0.642, p < 0.01), average heart rate (0.333, p < 0.01), and distances covered at 0–20 km/h (0.634, p < 0.01; 0.568, p < 0.01; 0.424, p < 0.01; 0.289, p < 0.01; 0.201, p < 0.015). There were no significant correlations between Edwards and average speed (0.158), distance over 20 km/h (0.014), number of accelerations performed in different zones (–0.194, –0.178, –0.171, –0.236), or number of normalized accelerations (–0.118, –0.038, –0.058, –0.035). Conclusions. The Edwards method and session-RPE are limited load monitoring tools to indicate the reality of training situations (high-intensity action with recovery intervals). |
|---|