Implications of counter-attacks in concordiense futsal association in 2013 league
The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of counterattack of tthe Concordiense Futsal Association in 2013. Asample was observed five (5) games of the finals of the League through videos of futsal Concordia, recorded on DVDs by the TV channel Sport TV. As an instrument of data collection &q...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.rbff.com.br:article/361 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/361 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Counterattack Concord Futsal National League Contra ataque Concordia Fútbol sala Liga nacional Contrattacco Lega Nazionale Contra-Ataque Concórdia Liga Nacional Contra-ataque |
| Sumario: | The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of counterattack of tthe Concordiense Futsal Association in 2013. Asample was observed five (5) games of the finals of the League through videos of futsal Concordia, recorded on DVDs by the TV channel Sport TV. As an instrument of data collection "SCOUT" was prepared consisting of specific quantifying defensive line happens the highest number of tackles and intercepting ball to create counter-attack, which is created numerical advantage in greater number and amount of counter-attack that results in a goal or not. After obtaining the results it was found that a total of 40 counterattacks, 60% of these were unarmed or intercepted on the defensive line 4, that the greatest benefits were created 3x2 and 2x1 with 45% and 32.5% respectively and 80% of them did not result in a goal. Thus it can be concluded that these actions are very expressive in a match, but they are not well utilized in conversion goals, because only 20% of counterattacks applied in matches end in goal, with a low incidence of utilization goals. |
|---|